Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.565. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory5. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||