Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Giti (59%). The first tyre test of Giti GitiWinter W1 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Winter W1 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter W1 is made in China and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.
| # | Giti GitiWinter W1
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost
2. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.56
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||