Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti GitiWinter W1 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.563. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,9 | 28 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
