Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti GitiWinter W1 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
