• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Giti Gitisynergy H2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

The Giti Gitisynergy H2 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 are two summer tyres from leading tyre manufacturers Giti and Kleber respectively. Both tyres are well-known in the market but exhibit different strengths and weaknesses in various tyre tests.


The Giti Gitisynergy H2 is particularly praised for its safe wet handling and short dry braking distances, along with its modest pricing. The tyre did show shortcomings like a tendency to understeer on a dry surface and very high rolling resistance. Unfortunately, in the tests consulted, there was a lack of ranking for the Giti Gitisynergy H2 by Autobild, with a lower ranking position of 29 by ADAC. As of now, no successor model replaced the Giti Gitisynergy H2 model.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 shows distinguished performance in comfort and exterior noise levels according to the Autobild test, with the tyre ranking 12th out of a total of 51 tyres tested. This tyre shows good environmental figures, tread life, abrasion and efficiency, although not fully balanced and displays weaknesses on a wet surface. The ADAC tyre test also ranked it in 12th position out of 50. Further, in another Autobild test, it showed good aquaplaning characteristics, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort and quiet running noise. However, noticeable are grip weaknesses in wet conditions, significantly delayed steering response and understeery handling on dry surfaces. There is no newer tyre model that has replaced the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 as of yet.


In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to outperform the Giti Gitisynergy H2 in overall test results, especially in areas such as comfort, noise levels, and aquaplaning characteristics. Nevertheless, the Giti Gitisynergy H2 brings value for money and offers reliable performance in certain areas like wet handling and short dry braking distances.


Therefore, if the decision is based purely on the test ranks and individual strengths, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to be the better choice. However, the ultimate decision should take into consideration the specific needs and preferences of the driver, and the tyre’s performance in those areas.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Wet Braking
Giti Gitisynergy H2
56%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Wet Handling
Giti Gitisynergy H2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Giti Gitisynergy H2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Giti Gitisynergy H2
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Giti Gitisynergy H2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Dry Braking
Giti Gitisynergy H2
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
71%
Dry Handling
Giti Gitisynergy H2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
61%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (92.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (91.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
91%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Noise Exterior
Giti Gitisynergy H2
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
91%
Best: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Rolling Resistance
Giti Gitisynergy H2
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
84%
Mileage
Giti Gitisynergy H2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (92.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison