Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle4. General Altimax One S Lowcost5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: General Altimax One S vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.385. General Altimax One S 32.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| General Altimax One S Rating: Good | 2,4 | 3,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Good | 2,9 | 3,2 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| General Altimax One S | 38,5 | 34,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 39,0 | 33,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
