Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost5. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Fulda SportControl 2 11.693. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.334. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
