In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Fulda (64%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2022 | 185/65 R15 | View |
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.