Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Fulda (68%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun also have B wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2018 | 195/65 R15 | View |
Performance comparison
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Fulda EcoControl HP
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
