Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle3. Fortuna EcoPlus 4S Lowcost4. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna EcoPlus 4S vs. Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.253. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended3. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Fortuna EcoPlus 4S | 43,9 | 63,1 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 51,1 | 56,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Fortuna EcoPlus 4S | 43,2 | 60,5 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
