18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 84%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 87%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 68%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Snow traction

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 84%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

69%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

86%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Mileage

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	34,8	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands