18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

91%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

88%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

88%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	1-
Show test details