Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
