• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

When comparing two summer tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk and the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, clear differences and similarities emerge. Both models, manufactured by Firestone and Barum respectively, have their strengths and weaknesses.


Firestone's Roadhawk is rated 59% on our website. It stands out best in ADAC's and Autobild's tests for its dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guide. Moreover, ADAC highlights its efficiency and light weight, praising its performance on dry roads, but notes its weakness on wet roads and running performance. Autobild further commends its low fuel consumption, but criticizes its poor performance on dry roads, slightly increased wear, and quite weak performance on wet surfaces.


In the same tests, Barum's Bravuris 5 HM scored lower with a rating of 39%. In the ADAC test, it ranks higher than the Roadhawk, clinching the 15th place out of 17 tested tyres. However, it is placed at a lower 42nd position out of 50 in the Autobild test. Details about its strengths or weaknesses, as well as a detailed report from Autobild are unfortunately not available.


Comparing both tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk outperforms overall in our ratings and in Autobild's test. Considering its strengths in handling and fuel efficiency, it seems to be the better choice for a summer tyre, provided drivers are conscious of its performance limits on wet roads.


The Barum Bravuris 5 HM, on the other hand, while not performing as strong overall, managed to claim a better position in the ADAC test. However, in absence of detailed reviews, it's difficult to thoroughly compare its performance with the Roadhawk.


As of now, neither the Roadhawk nor the Bravuris 5 HM appears to have been replaced by a newer model. This analysis is based on the current versions of each tyre, as detailed on our website.


In summary, while both tyres have their merits, the Firestone Roadhawk generally outperforms the Barum Bravuris 5 HM in our ratings and test results. They both serve as reliable choices for summer tyres with respective focused attributes.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
18%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (94.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (81.0%)
Noise Interior
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (89.0%)
Best in category: Sava Intensa UHP 2 (79.5%)
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Fuel Efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Best: Michelin Primacy 4 (94.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4 (89.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison