Segment
1. Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 has A rating.
| # | Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Highly recommended
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE914 ECORUN Rating: Highly recommended | 218 | 114 | 104 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun | 37,4 | 29,8 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||