Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 has A rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autozeitung
|
Summer
|
2020 | 225/50 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
