• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2024 215/55 R17 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and Kumho Ecsta HS52 are two touring summer tyres manufactured by Falken and Kumho respectively. Both tyres have been tested under various conditions and are rated very closely, with a score of 81% in our ranking.


The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun shines in dry handling and comfort measurements. According to Autobild, its best features include dry handling, aquaplaning - longitudinal, comfort, and wet braking. However, the tyre seems to have shortcomings in terms of mileage. Based on the reviews, the ZE310 Ecorun has excellent aquaplaning characteristics, stable wet handling, short braking distances, dynamic dry handling, and is comparably quiet. An observed weakness is its high rolling resistance.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, replacing the previous Ecsta HS51 model, stands out for its dry braking, dry handling, wet braking and its good price/value ratio. According to Autobild, the tyre has convincing driving performance on both wet and dry circuits, and short braking distances for both conditions. However, it seems to lack in terms of rolling comfort. Reviewers pointed out the tyre's balanced handling, safe behaviour on both wet and dry roads, very good predicted mileage, low wear, and low fuel consumption. Slight weaknesses were noticed in aquaplaning behaviour, and the tyre weight was considered high.


Regarding the positioning in mutual tests the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mostly ranked higher, specifically: in Vibilagare test it holds the 3rd position compared to Falken's 4th position out of 9, and in autobild's testing of 51 tyres where it is 3rd against Falken's 5th place.


To summarize, if you're looking for a tyre with high dry handling and comfort, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun would be the better choice. However, if you prefer a tyre that scores high in dry and wet braking with an appealing price/value ratio and solid performance on varying road conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is definitely worth considering. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, so the final decision largely depends on your specific needs and driving conditions.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet Handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Wet Circle Cornering
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (94.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
61%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (97.5%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (90.2%)
Dry Performance
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Dry Handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Best: Michelin Primacy 4 (92.0%)
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (91.8%)
Comfort & Noise
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Best: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Ride Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (91.0%)
Economy
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (97.3%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison