These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and Kumho Ecsta HS52 are two touring summer tyres manufactured by Falken and Kumho respectively. Both tyres have been tested under various conditions and are rated very closely, with a score of 81% in our ranking.
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun shines in dry handling and comfort measurements. According to Autobild, its best features include dry handling, aquaplaning - longitudinal, comfort, and wet braking. However, the tyre seems to have shortcomings in terms of mileage. Based on the reviews, the ZE310 Ecorun has excellent aquaplaning characteristics, stable wet handling, short braking distances, dynamic dry handling, and is comparably quiet. An observed weakness is its high rolling resistance.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, replacing the previous Ecsta HS51 model, stands out for its dry braking, dry handling, wet braking and its good price/value ratio. According to Autobild, the tyre has convincing driving performance on both wet and dry circuits, and short braking distances for both conditions. However, it seems to lack in terms of rolling comfort. Reviewers pointed out the tyre's balanced handling, safe behaviour on both wet and dry roads, very good predicted mileage, low wear, and low fuel consumption. Slight weaknesses were noticed in aquaplaning behaviour, and the tyre weight was considered high.
Regarding the positioning in mutual tests the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mostly ranked higher, specifically: in Vibilagare test it holds the 3rd position compared to Falken's 4th position out of 9, and in autobild's testing of 51 tyres where it is 3rd against Falken's 5th place.
To summarize, if you're looking for a tyre with high dry handling and comfort, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun would be the better choice. However, if you prefer a tyre that scores high in dry and wet braking with an appealing price/value ratio and solid performance on varying road conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is definitely worth considering. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, so the final decision largely depends on your specific needs and driving conditions.
Averaged from 3 tests
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.