• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
ACE ACE
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2023 225/40 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View

Today, we'll discuss and compare two powerful tyres: Falken Azenis FK520 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. Produced by their respective renowned manufacturers, Falken and Hankook, both tyres have displayed commendable performance in recent tests.


The Falken Azenis FK520 is an updated version of the Azenis FK510. The tyre, designed in Japan and made in Turkey, is a summer tyre with a UUHP subtype. It proudly receives an overall rating of 82% in our in-house test results. Top performances in Autobild's test included high resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning and lower exterior noise, ensuring a quieter, smoother drive. However, Azenis FK520 positioned nine out of ten in ACE tests and eighth out of 50 in Autobild's performance list. Notably, the Azenis FK520 performance was impressive on dry ground but displayed limited side guide on wet surfaces.


On the other hand, we have Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. Manufactured in Korea and widely used by Audi and BMW, this summer tyre performs tremendously in these renowned car models. It gets an overall rating of 81% on our platform. Its highest achievement includes first position in a pool of 50 competitors in Autobild's tests with remarkable wet and dry braking. Although, one point to note is that its average mileage could be better. Outperforming Azenis FK520, the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 took seventh place in ACE's performance ranking.


So, which one to go for? While both tyres offer quality, if you prefer quiet, dry drives, the Falken Azenis FK520 would likely serve you better. However, if top-performance on both wet and dry surfaces is your prime concern, Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 shines brighter. We suggest our users think about their driving conditions and hours before deciding one. Manufacturers of both these tyres continue to innovate and improve. Therefore, keep following our page for the latest updates on these and other brands.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Falken Azenis FK520
67%
Falken
Azenis FK520
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
73%
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Wet Braking
Falken Azenis FK520
72%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
95%
Wet Handling
Falken Azenis FK520
65%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
77%
Best: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (90.5%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Falken Azenis FK520
67%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
80%
Best: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (92.5%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Falken Azenis FK520
72%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
67%
Aquaplaning Cross
Falken Azenis FK520
61%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
45%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (85.4%)
Dry Performance
Falken Azenis FK520
80%
Falken
Azenis FK520
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
81%
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Dry Braking
Falken Azenis FK520
83%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
86%
Dry Handling
Falken Azenis FK520
76%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
76%
Best: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (94.5%)
Best in category: Continental SportContact 7 (95.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Falken Azenis FK520
81%
Falken
Azenis FK520
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
75%
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Noise Exterior
Falken Azenis FK520
81%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
75%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer UHP (92.0%)
Best in category: Kleber Dynaxer UHP (92.0%)
Economy
Falken Azenis FK520
70%
Falken
Azenis FK520
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
62%
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rolling Resistance
Falken Azenis FK520
69%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
75%
Mileage
Falken Azenis FK520
71%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
49%
Best in category: Firestone Firehawk Sport (100.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison