Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2

The Falken Azenis FK510 and Sava Intensa UHP 2 are two summer tyres that you should consider for your vehicle. Let's perform a thorough comparison of these two tyres based on various test data, highlighting their strengths and shortcomings.

The Falken Azenis FK510, a product of Falken, is manufactured in Japan and Turkey, and it is one of the preferred choices for summer tyres. The tyre has an overall rating of 74%, with strengths in interior noise reduction, wet handling, mileage, and even exterior noise reduction. It performed exceptionally well in ADAC and Autobild tests, securing the 8th and 3rd positions respectively out of 16 and 52 tyres in the tests. However, it is noted for its slightly higher fuel consumption, according to the ADAC 2021 report. Note that this tyre is replaced by a newer model, the Falken Azenis FK520.

On the other hand, the Sava Intensa UHP 2, from the Sava, is another summer tyre known for its efficient fuel consumption, excellent noise reduction features, and top performance in aquaplaning. In the ADAC test, it secured the 6th position out of 16 total tyres, and 11th out of 52 tyres in the Autobild test. Interestingly, both tests highlighted its excellent mileage and optimum price value. Despite these strengths, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is known for its slightly increased wear and struggles on wet surfaces, as mentioned in the ADAC 2021 report. This tyre upgraded from its previous model, the Sava Intensa UHP, but currently doesn't have any newer model replacing it.

In overall comparison, the Falken Azenis FK510 leads with a higher overall rating and balanced performance on both dry and wet surfaces, despite its slightly higher fuel consumption. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 isn't far behind, though, with a near-identical rating and particular strengths in fuel efficiency and noise reduction.

Remember, the best tyre for your vehicle ultimately depends on your specific needs and the driving conditions you most often encounter. These comprehensive tests provide a good basis for comparison, but individual experiences might vary.