Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium4. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle5. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
This direct comparison of the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Bridgestone Turanza T001 brings together test placings and our site ratings so you can quickly see which summer tyre performs better in independent evaluations. These two models appear in the same test pools and give a useful head-to-head snapshot for buyers prioritising balanced performance.
Quick links: Falken Azenis FK510 — manufacturer: Falken. Replaced by: Falken Azenis FK520 (newer model). Bridgestone Turanza T001 — manufacturer: Bridgestone.
Test summary and positions
- Autobild test (52 tyres): FK510 — 3rd, Turanza T001 — 5th.
- GTÜ test (14 tyres): FK510 — 5th, Turanza T001 — 7th.
- Our overall site rating: Falken Azenis FK510: 58%. The Bridgestone Turanza T001 shows 0% on our site (no consolidated score recorded here).
What the numbers tell us
The Falken Azenis FK510 consistently finished ahead of the Bridgestone Turanza T001 in the mutual tests listed: better placement in both Autobild (3 vs 5) and GTÜ (5 vs 7). These higher positions indicate the FK510 delivered a stronger, more competitive package across the measured criteria of those test organizers.
Strengths — Falken Azenis FK510
- Consistently higher test placings point to well-balanced summer performance — usually a blend of wet/dry grip and handling that tests reward.
- Rated 58% on our site, which signals a solid all-round profile compared with peers in the same test batches.
- Manufactured in JP and TR, showing multi-region production.
Weaknesses — Falken Azenis FK510
- Although competitive in tests, the FK510’s mid-range overall score suggests there are trade-offs (wear, fuel efficiency, noise or extreme-condition limits) versus segment leaders — buyers should check detailed test sections for specific metrics.
- Model lifecycle: the FK510 has been superseded by the FK520, so consider the newer model for updated compound or tread improvements.
Strengths — Bridgestone Turanza T001
- Solid test performance inside the top third in Autobild and mid-pack in GTÜ — an indicator of reliable everyday behaviour typical of comfort-orientated touring tyres.
- Backed by a major brand with broad OE and aftermarket pedigree: see Bridgestone’s range here.
Weaknesses — Bridgestone Turanza T001
- Placed behind the FK510 in both mutual tests, meaning it was outperformed in the measures those organizers value.
- Our site lacks a consolidated score for this model (0%), which can make direct numeric comparison harder — consult full test reports for granular data.
Verdict
Across the shared test entries, the Falken Azenis FK510 outperforms the Bridgestone Turanza T001 overall, taking better positions in both Autobild and GTÜ. The FK510 is the stronger choice if you prioritise test-proven handling and competitive rankings, but note it has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520 — consider the newer FK520 for the latest improvements. The Turanza T001 remains a respectable touring tyre with likely strengths in comfort and consistency; check detailed braking, wear and noise figures in the full test reports to decide which aligns best with your needs.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended5. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Uniroyal RainSport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 36,4 | 34,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,4 | 38,3 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | 35,2 | 37,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 244 | 114 | 130 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 235 | 109 | 126 | 19 | 8 | ||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 263 | 133 | 130 | 19 | 9 | ||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | 267 | 134 | 133 | 19 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
