Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK453 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2016 235/40 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Azenis FK453 has A wet grip rating, whereas 51% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 has B rating.
| # | Falken Azenis FK453
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,8 | 7,5 | 8,2 | 6 | 10 | ||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,3 | 10 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||