Segment
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk
In this article, we will compare two summer tyres, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse and the Nokian WetProof. Both tyres have been tested in various scenarios and we'll be analyzing their strengths and weaknesses based on the test results. Before diving into the details, let's take a quick look at each tyre.
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
The Dunlop Sport BluResponse is a summer tyre designed to deliver high performance, excellent grip, and reduced rolling resistance. It has an overall rating of 85% on our website. Manufactured by Dunlop, this tyre has not been replaced by a newer model yet.
Nokian WetProof
On the other hand, the Nokian WetProof is also a summer tyre, but it primarily focuses on wet performance and safety. It has an overall rating of 87% on our website and is manufactured in Finland by Nokian. Just like the Dunlop Sport BluResponse, there is no newer tyre that replaces this model.
Test Results Comparison
We will now summarize the test results from Autoklub ČR, ADAC, autoklubcr 2023, Autobild, and ACE for both tyres.
Autoklub ČR
Out of 19 tested tyres, the Nokian WetProof ranked 6th, while the Dunlop Sport BluResponse ranked 12th. The Nokian WetProof had the best exterior noise performance.
ADAC
In the ADAC test, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse ranked 4th out of 18 tyres, whereas the Nokian WetProof ranked 6th.
autoklubcr 2023
According to the autoklubcr 2023 test, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse performed well on dry roads, was efficient and light but showed slight weakness on wet roads and had a relatively low mileage. On the other hand, the Nokian WetProof was balanced, performed well on dry and wet roads, and was efficient. However, it also showed weaknesses in environmental performance, mileage, and wear, as well as slight weaknesses in sustainability.
Autobild
In Autobild's test, out of 53 tyres, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse was ranked 11th, while the Nokian WetProof ranked 6th. Dunlop Sport BluResponse was noted for its comfort.
ACE
Out of 9 tested tyres, the Nokian WetProof ranked 1st and the Dunlop Sport BluResponse ranked 2nd. The Dunlop Sport BluResponse excelled in the areas of aquaplaning (cross and longitudinal), dry driving behavior, dry handling, wet handling, and wet handling-objective. The Nokian WetProof, on the other hand, outperformed in wet braking, wet handling, and wet handling-objective.
Verdict
In summary, the Nokian WetProof outperforms the Dunlop Sport BluResponse in most of the tests, especially in wet conditions. The Nokian WetProof is an excellent choice for those who prioritize wet performance and safety. On the other hand, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse offers good performance on dry roads and is a more comfortable tyre. Depending on your priorities, both tyres can be a great addition to your vehicle. Make sure to check our website for more information on each tyre and their respective Dunlop and Nokian manufacturers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 98,6 | 97,8 | 99,3 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof | 101,3 | 102,2 | 100,4 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 35,4 | 32,2 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 66 | 51 | 19 | 10 | 17 | |
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Highly recommended | 152 | 63 | 49 | 18 | 7 | 15 | |
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 66 | 45 | 17 | 8 | 17 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
