Segment
1. Dunlop All Season 2 Premium3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle4. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle5. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Lowcost
Comparison: Dunlop All Season 2 vs. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner4. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory5. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory4. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory5. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 130 |
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Recommended | 97.6 | 99.3 | 93.5 | 99.7 | 98.6 | 100.0 | 99.1 | 87.0 | 94.4 | 130 |
| Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Rating: Sufficient | 95.2 | 95.6 | 85.5 | 100.0 | 86.2 | 75.6 | 100.0 | 86.8 | 94.1 | 98 |
| Show test details | ||||||||||
