Segment
1. Dunlop All Season 2 Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle3. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Lowcost
Comparison: Dunlop All Season 2 vs. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 130 |
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Recommended | 97.6 | 99.3 | 93.5 | 99.7 | 98.6 | 100.0 | 99.1 | 87.0 | 94.4 | 130 |
| Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Rating: Sufficient | 95.2 | 95.6 | 85.5 | 100.0 | 86.2 | 75.6 | 100.0 | 86.8 | 94.1 | 98 |
| Show test details | ||||||||||
