In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Debica (56%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2022 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Debica Presto UHP2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.