Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.475. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory4. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37.9 | 28.1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36.9 | 28.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
