Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Frigo HP2 17.333. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
