Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.353. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
