Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 69% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Debica Frigo HP2 /50%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /69%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Debica Frigo HP2

/50%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

/69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R15 - R18

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 107

2. Debica Frigo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 25x

2. Debica Frigo HP2 8x

Best position in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

2. Debica Frigo HP2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

2. Debica Frigo HP2 24.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 7.68

2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13

Year of the last test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 2023

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2023

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

93%

Debica
Frigo HP2

83%

Snow traction

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 84%

Snow braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 96%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 85%

Snow handling

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 95%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 84%

Snow cornering

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 90%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 79%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Debica
Frigo HP2

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 71%

Wet braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 79%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 64%

Wet handling

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 71%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 B

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

74%

Debica
Frigo HP2

70%

Dry handling

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 71%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 66%

Dry braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 73%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

Debica
Frigo HP2

73%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 94%

2. Debica Frigo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Debica Frigo HP2 80%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

83%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77%

Rolling resistance

1. Debica Frigo HP2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

Mileage

1. Debica Frigo HP2 69%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

Price/value

1. Debica Frigo HP2 94%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 86%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 C

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3+	3	2+	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
Show test details