Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Debica (52%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 52% compared to 48% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2018 | 195/65 R15 | View |
Performance comparison
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Debica Frigo HP2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
