Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
