Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.674. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.255. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good5. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 59 | 25.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
