Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

81%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 71%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 59%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 59%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 55%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%