18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 93% compared to 87% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was done in 2021, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 P and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where WinterContact TS 870 P is made - Czech Republic.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R0 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snow handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 71%

Wet handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2	2	1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1–	1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2	2+	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good	2+	2+	1–	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	35.6	28.0
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+	33.5	28.3
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands