Segment
2. Dunlop Winter Premium3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle5. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Dunlop Winter 1.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Exemplary2. Dunlop Winter Exemplary3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good5. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Dunlop Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Rating: Good | 2– | 2 | 2– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 35.6 | 28.0 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter | 33.3 | 27.5 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 | 34.9 | 29.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
