18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R13 - R18	R13 - R19	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Barum Polaris 3 66

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Barum Polaris 3 10x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

3. Barum Polaris 3 3.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Barum Polaris 3 16.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

3. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Barum Polaris 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Barum
Polaris 3

74%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

3. Barum Polaris 3 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

89%

Barum
Polaris 3

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

85%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Barum
Polaris 3

75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

4. Barum Polaris 3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Barum
Polaris 3

78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

3. Barum Polaris 3 F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Barum Polaris 3	36,7	27,8
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands