Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
