18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental VanContact Winter /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%	Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R15 - R17	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental VanContact Winter 46

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 19

Number of tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 2x

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 1x

Best position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

Worst position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

Average position in tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11

Year of the last test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 2019

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

77%

Continental
VanContact Winter

61.8%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

58.4%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

94.2%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

58.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

46.5%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental VanContact Winter B

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

85.1%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

74.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

68.8%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

89.8%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

82%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 72 dB

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

3. Continental VanContact Winter ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

80%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

43%

Continental
VanContact Winter

43%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental VanContact Winter C

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 F

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

83.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended	2,4	2,3	2,7	2,8	3,1	3,0	2,2
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,2	3,2	3,0	2,5	2,5	2,5	2,0
Show test details