• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2021 225/50 R17 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2020 225/40 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2019 225/45 R17 View

When comparing two summer tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2, there are a few key points to note.


The Continental PremiumContact 6, rated at 87%, is known as a touring tyne that was manufactured in SK, DE, and CZ. It is a newer model replacing the Continental PremiumContact 5. In Promobil's test, it scored 2nd out of 8 tyres and landed in the 1st position in both the ADAC and Autobild tests. Key factors contributing to this were wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet braking, mileage, dry handling, and good price/value. Remarkably, it was assessed to have"Keine besonderen Schwächen" meaning no particular weaknesses.


Moving onto the Sava Intensa UHP 2, rated at 73%, is endeared for its noise reduction, aquaplaning - cross, fuel efficiency, and mileage. However, it holds the 8th position in Promobil's test out of 8 tyres, 6th place in the ADAC test out of 16 tyres, and 11th place in the Autobild competition among 52 tyres. It was praised for its good performance on dry road, relatively low exterior noise but criticized for "Leicht erhöhter Verschleiß, Schwächen auf Nässe (Abwertung)" pointing out slight increased wear and performance deficiencies on wet surface.


In evaluated data from all the tests, the Continental PremiumContact 6 wins overall with higher ratings, and better test positions. However, Sava Intensa UHP 2 tyre is still a commendable choice, especially considering its performance on dry road and quieter ride.


More about these tires can be found at their manufactures's sites here: Continental Tyres and Sava Tyres.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Sava Intensa UHP 2
75%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
63%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Best: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 (92.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
89%
Best: Fulda SportControl 2 (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (90.8%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Sava Intensa UHP 2
92%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
97%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
98%
Best: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Sava Intensa UHP 2
75%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
63%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Noise Interior
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Fuel Efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
88%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison