• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

In the world of tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 are two popular summer tyre choices for consumers. Both are well-reputed products from their respective manufacturers, Continental and Kumho, and have been thoroughly tested by various organisations for their performance, safety, and longevity.


The Continental PremiumContact 6 is the successor of the legacy line, replacing the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. This touring tyre is made in Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic and is rated at 90% by our experts.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a summer tyre that does not have any predecessor or direct replacement. Its rating from our experts stands at 79%, making it a reliable choice for various weather conditions.


Comparing these two tyres based on mutual tests positions and overall performance, we can observe the following data:



  • ADAC Test: The Continental PremiumContact 6 ranked 1st among 16 tested tyres, impressing with its wet circle cornering, wet handling, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 secured the 10th position with its aquaplaning resistance, both cross and longitudinal.

  • Autobild Test: In this test with 53 total tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 achieved the 8th position, showcasing its dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 came in at 18th place.

  • ACE Test: Out of 11 tested tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 took 5th place, primarily due to its dry driving behavior. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 surpassed expectations, coming in at 2nd place, demonstrating excellent aquaplaning resistance and minimal exterior noise.


To summarise, the Continental PremiumContact 6 excels in wet conditions, offering outstanding wet circle cornering, wet handling, and wet braking capabilities. It is also highly energy efficient, providing a reduced fuel consumption rate. On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 delivers a balanced performance on both wet and dry surfaces, with excellent aquaplaning resistance and reduced exterior noise.


Both tyres have their unique strengths and weaknesses, but overall, the Continental PremiumContact 6 comes ahead in most of the mutual tests, making it a better choice for those seeking a versatile and reliable summer tyre.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
77%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
78%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
92%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
87%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
70%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
78%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
58%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
89%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Nexen N fera Sport
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nexen N fera Sport
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
84%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
79%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
86%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
71%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
68%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
75%
Noise Interior
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
69%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
61%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
65%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
46%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Nexen N fera Sport
87%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
76%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
73%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison