• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

In this comparison, we will analyse two high-quality summer tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, both in the touring subType.


Made by world-class manufacturers Continental and Falken, these tyres are always in the focus of the tyre tests. In this comparison, we will use data from various tests to give you the most comprehensive understanding of these two tyres.


The Continental PremiumContact 6, manufactured in SK, DE and CZ, scores an impressive 83% in our ratings. According to the Autobild 2022 test result, the strengths of this tyre are its balanced performance, high level of safety and good handling both on dry and wet roads. Nevertheless, it showed some weaknesses in efficiency. Another crucial point to mention is that the PremiumContact 6 had been replaced by the newer Continental PremiumContact 7 model.


On the other hand, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, made in TR, scores a respectable 75% in our ratings. Autobild 2022 test highlighted it as a balanced tyre with good performance on dry and wet surfaces. The areas where this tyre could improve are environmental performance, efficiency and sustainability. There is as yet no subsequent model available to replace this tyre.


In various tests, Continental PremiumContact 6 outperformed Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun. In the ADAC test, Continental PremiumContact 6 was 2nd out of 50 tyres, while Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun was placed 6th. According to Autobild, Continental performed better in tests such as Wet braking, Dry braking, Handling on gravel, Wet circle cornering, Wet handling, claiming the 4th position out of 53 compared to Falken's 8th position. In ACE tests, Continental stood at 3rd position out of 9 while Falken secured 5th.


As a conclusion, both Continental PremiumContact 6 and Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun are high-performing tyres with their own strengths and weaknesses. However, Continental PremiumContact 6 seems to have a slight edge in terms of overall performance based on the collected test results.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
97%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
51%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (96.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (92.8%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
83%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (92.0%)
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (90.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
72%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Ride Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (81.7%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
69%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (98.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison