Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental EcoContact 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Continental EcoContact 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Continental EcoContact 5
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
