Segment
3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary3. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
Worst rating in test
2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended4. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | ||||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 9,2 | ||||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 8,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 9,3 | 9,1 | ||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: - | 9,2 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 8,6 | 9,1 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 8,1 | 7,9 | 7,4 | 8,8 | 8,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
