18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Semperit Speed-Grip 5 /78%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R14 - R19	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 112

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 93

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 12x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 19.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 9.33

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 2025

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

Best rating in test

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Exemplary

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

63.8%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 67%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Wet braking

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 63%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

74%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

68.3%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 76%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 74%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 75%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

71%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

66%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

64.3%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 61%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Dry handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

77%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

71.4%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

75%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

68%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 73%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 77%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	1-	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands