Segment
2. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Michelin Alpin A4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 Exemplary3. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 Recommended3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 | 39,5 | 27,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 415 | 144 | 136 | 144 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 Rating: Highly recommended | 415 | 144 | 127 | 144 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 346 | 95 | 116 | 135 | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Highly recommended | 367 | 114 | 124 | 129 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1 | 2- | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
