Segment
3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good3. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,4 | ||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 9,1 | 5,6 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 9,1 | 9,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | 267 | 134 | 133 | 19 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
