Segment
2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle3. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 36,4 | 36 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP | 37,7 | 40,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | 1,5 | 3,2 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
