Segment
2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good3. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 36,4 | 36 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP | 37,7 | 40,5 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 35,6 | 38,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | 1,5 | 3,2 | 2,1 | ||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,9 | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
