Segment
2. Pirelli Scorpion Verde Premium3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium4. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Pirelli Scorpion Verde vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary3. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Pirelli Scorpion Verde Rating: Good | 9,4 | 9,4 | 5 | 7 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
