• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2018 195/65 R15 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2018 175/65 R14 View

Today, we are comparing two summer tyres, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, and the Fulda EcoControl HP. The Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 is a high-quality tyre with excellent performance, rated at 90% in our tests. It is manufactured in the Czech Republic, and has been replaced by the newer model, the Continental PremiumContact 6. On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP has a rating of 81%, and also has a newer version, the Fulda EcoControl HP2.


In the Autobild test, where 50 different tyres were compared, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 scored 9th place, while the Fulda EcoControl HP outperformed it and took 7th place. Notably, the Fulda EcoControl HP's best features were its mileage and price/value ratio.


In the ADAC test with 14 compared tyres, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 achieved 9th place again, this time showing its strength in wet circle cornering. The Fulda EcoControl HP, on the other hand, came in 11th place.


Verdict: Both the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and the Fulda EcoControl HP have their strengths and weaknesses. The Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 offers excellent performance and is a great choice for drivers looking for top-notch quality, while the Fulda EcoControl HP provides better mileage and value for money. Considering their positions in mutual tests, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 seems to be a better option for drivers who prioritise performance, whereas the Fulda EcoControl HP might suit those who value savings and durability more.


Both Continental and Fulda have a wide range of summer tyres available, catering to the preferences and requirements of different drivers.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Fulda EcoControl HP
89%
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Wet Braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Best: Maxxis Mecotra 3 (97.0%)
Wet Handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
90%
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Best: Avon ZV7 (98.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (95.0%)
Dry Performance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
96%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Dry Handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
96%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Noise Exterior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Best: Infinity Ecosis (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
67%
Best in category: Infinity Ecosis (100.0%)
Economy
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
69%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Fulda EcoControl HP
76%
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Rolling Resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
54%
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Best: Giti Synergy E1 (100.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Best in category: Michelin Energy Saver + (86.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison